Anti-Trans Act SURVIVES Legal Firestorm!
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld Arkansas’s ban on gender transition treatments for minors, marking a legal shift that could encourage other states to enact similar restrictions.
At a Glance
• Eighth Circuit voted 8–2 to uphold Arkansas’s SAFE Act banning gender-affirming care for minors
• Decision draws heavily from a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on Tennessee’s similar law
• Enforcement will begin within two weeks, with felony penalties for providers
• More than 26 states have considered or enacted comparable measures
Arkansas Ban on Youth Gender Transition Care Upheld
On August 12, 2025, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a 2023 lower court ruling that blocked Arkansas’s SAFE Act (Act 626). The law prohibits puberty blockers, hormone therapies, and surgeries for anyone under 18, and bars doctors from providing referrals for such care. Passed in 2021 over a gubernatorial veto, the SAFE Act now has full legal backing following the appeals court’s 8–2 decision.
Watch now: Arkansas ban on gender transition care for minors upheld · YouTube
Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Attorney General Tim Griffin hailed the ruling as a victory for parental rights and child protection, emphasizing that medical providers must comply or face felony charges. Enforcement is expected to begin within two weeks, effectively ending all gender-affirming care for minors in the state.
Origins and Legal Journey of Arkansas’s SAFE Act
Arkansas became the first state to pass such a law in 2021, igniting a wave of similar legislation across the country. The SAFE Act’s stated purpose is to protect minors from irreversible medical interventions. Opponents, including the ACLU, argued that the law violates constitutional rights and harms transgender youth by denying medically recommended care.
A federal judge blocked the law in 2023, but the legal climate shifted after the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Tennessee’s comparable ban in June 2025. The Eighth Circuit cited that precedent in reinstating Arkansas’s law, reflecting a growing judicial tendency to defer to state legislatures on medical regulations for minors.
More than 26 states have since pursued or enacted similar bans, signaling that Arkansas’s legal win could influence national policy debates and future court decisions.
Stakeholders, Reactions, and Broader Implications
Key supporters of the SAFE Act include state legislators, Governor Sanders, and Attorney General Griffin, who frame the law as a child welfare measure. Medical associations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics oppose the ban, citing established medical guidelines and the potential for negative mental health outcomes in transgender youth.
Providers face significant legal and professional consequences if they continue offering prohibited care. Advocacy groups for transgender rights warn of increased mental health crises, potential relocation of affected families, and reduced healthcare access.
Politically, the ruling bolsters lawmakers in conservative states pushing similar measures. Legally, it strengthens the precedent for state-level restrictions, making it harder for future challenges to succeed. As enforcement begins, Arkansas stands as both a test case and a catalyst in the national debate over parental rights, medical ethics, and the scope of state authority in healthcare.
Sources
Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals
American Academy of Pediatrics