Arizona Supreme Court Greenlights Controversial Immigration Ballot Measure

In a landmark decision, the Arizona Supreme Court has ruled that a sweeping immigration enforcement proposal will appear on the November ballot, setting the stage for a heated debate over state authority in border control. The measure, Proposition 314, would grant local law enforcement unprecedented powers in dealing with illegal border crossings.

Chief Justice Ann A. Scott Timmer dismissed challenges to the proposal, affirming its compliance with the state’s single-subject rule. If passed, the measure would introduce far-reaching changes to Arizona’s approach to illegal immigration and border security.

Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) welcomed the court’s decision, stating, “This gives Arizonans a voice in securing their communities. It’s a necessary step given the federal government’s failure to address the border crisis.”

Key aspects of Proposition 314 include:

• • Authorizing state and local police to arrest illegal entrants
  • Granting judges the power to order deportations
  • Requiring E-Verify for public benefits enrollment
  • Establishing severe penalties for fentanyl-related deaths

The proposal draws comparisons to Texas’ contentious Senate Bill 4, which faced legal opposition from the Biden administration. Arizona State Sen. Justine Wadsack (R) described Proposition 314 as an even stronger version of the Texas law.

Critics argue that the measure infringes on federal jurisdiction over immigration matters. However, proponents maintain it’s a crucial step in addressing border security concerns.

As Arizona prepares for this significant vote, other states are closely monitoring the situation. Oklahoma, Iowa and Louisiana have explored similar measures, indicating a potential shift in state-level approaches to immigration enforcement.

The outcome of Arizona’s vote could have far-reaching implications, potentially reshaping the national conversation on border security and state authority in immigration matters.