Border Patrol Storms Home Depot—ANGER Erupts!

A dramatic Border Patrol raid in California has reignited fierce debate over the clash between federal immigration authority and the state’s sanctuary laws, with racial profiling accusations and political fallout already erupting.

At a Glance

• U.S. Border Patrol raided a Sacramento Home Depot, arresting 11 suspected undocumented immigrants.

• One arrested individual had 67 prior California jail bookings dating back to 1986.

• The raid was carried out despite California’s sanctuary protections under Senate Bill 54.

• Governor Gavin Newsom condemned the operation, citing racial profiling concerns.

• The incident has intensified state-federal tensions on immigration enforcement.

Federal Force Meets State Defiance

In an assertive show of federal power, U.S. Border Patrol agents, led by El Centro sector chief Greg Bovino, executed a controversial raid at a Home Depot parking lot in Sacramento, far from the U.S.-Mexico border. The July 2025 sweep netted 11 arrests, with agents targeting individuals suspected of residing illegally in the U.S. The operation has since become a flashpoint in the ongoing war between California’s sanctuary policies and Washington’s immigration crackdown.

The raid stands in direct defiance of California’s Senate Bill 54, the California Values Act, which curtails local cooperation with federal immigration authorities to protect undocumented communities. State officials and immigrant rights groups have decried the incursion as a violation of the state’s autonomy and an act of racial profiling.

Watch a report: Sacramento Immigration Raid Fallout

The Arrests and Escalating Tensions

Among those detained, one man’s record stood out—67 prior jail bookings since 1986, yet no prior deportation. This revelation has fueled arguments that federal authorities must intervene where state protections allegedly enable repeat offenders to evade removal. However, the arrest of at least one U.S. citizen, Jose Castillo, has further inflamed critics, who claim the raid was indiscriminate and reckless.

The Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office maintained it did not assist in the federal operation, underscoring the jurisdictional boundaries drawn by California law. Meanwhile, Home Depot distanced itself from the controversy, asserting it had no foreknowledge of the raid, which has now sparked community protests and public outrage.

National Reverberations

Governor Newsom swiftly condemned the raid, calling it an egregious example of racial profiling and an affront to California’s values. Immigration advocates warn that such raids fracture community trust and escalate fear within immigrant neighborhoods, potentially deterring cooperation with law enforcement on unrelated crimes.

Politically, the incident has deepened the state-versus-federal rift, with both sides doubling down on their respective mandates. For the federal government, the raid is positioned as a necessary enforcement action to uphold immigration law and public safety. For California, it represents an infringement on state sovereignty and an assault on human rights.

This flashpoint may well set the stage for renewed legal battles and policy shifts, as both sides vie for control over immigration enforcement within U.S. borders.