Nebraska Legislature Considers Winner-Take-All Electoral System Again

Nebraska is once again debating whether to switch from its current electoral vote distribution system to a winner-take-all format, sparking a renewed effort in the state legislature. This proposal has surfaced multiple times but was most recently blocked in April, leaving some lawmakers frustrated by the gridlock.

Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen (R) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) led the charge in a recent meeting with state Republicans to revive the initiative. Nebraska’s current system awards electoral votes based on both statewide results and individual congressional districts, making it one of only two states with such a setup. Critics of the current structure argue that it could allow a Democratic candidate to win a crucial vote in the Second Congressional District, which went to President Joe Biden in 2020.

During their discussions, Graham warned Republicans about the possible consequences of maintaining the current system. He stressed that “one electoral vote” could make all the difference in a close national election. President Donald Trump also voiced his support for the effort, speaking with state lawmakers and urging them to back the proposal.

Some legislators remain hesitant, though, with several holdouts preventing the bill from moving forward. State Sen. Mike McDonnell (R), a former Democrat who recently switched parties, has been seen as a key vote in the debate, especially given his potential mayoral run in Omaha — a district that would lose its separate electoral vote under the new system.

Despite the challenges, supporters of the winner-take-all system believe the change would strengthen Republican candidates’ chances in Nebraska and have a broader national impact. If the proposal passes, it could alter the landscape of future elections, especially in a state as politically competitive as Nebraska.