Stockman DISMISSES Houthi Threat?
David Stockman challenges the perception of the Houthi threat, arguing they’re no danger to US security or energy, making a case for shifting US foreign policy priorities.
At a Glance
The Houthis in Yemen have limited military capabilities and do not threaten US security.
US military involvement in Yemen may exacerbate regional tensions rather than resolve them.
The strategic importance of the Red Sea is overstated concerning US interests.
Stockman calls for a shift in US policy to prioritize domestic concerns over foreign entanglements.
Reevaluating the Houthi Threat
David Stockman contends that the hysteria regarding the Houthis in Yemen is unjustified. The territory they control in Yemen is limited, lacking a navy, air force, or regular army, which diminishes their capability for significant military action against the US. Stockman points out that the Houthis have no feasible strategy for threatening American soil, a stark contrast to the narrative driven by those advocating for military intervention.
Stockman critiques the US’s role as the global enforcer, redirecting focus to homeland security. He argues that efforts should concentrate on tangible threats rather than the assumed dangers posed by the Houthis in Yemen. In his analysis, regional powers like Saudi Arabia and Egypt have a more direct interest in this conflict but haven’t contributed substantially to military actions against the Houthis, highlighting regional dynamics.
Misguided Military Engagements
Stockman’s perspective includes a broader critique of US military actions, noting that such interventions often fail to benefit national security. Instead, they may potentially endanger American forces. The article argues that the Red Sea’s significance is inflated since oil and trade routes are more crucial to Europe than to the US. This reinforces Stockman’s point that American resources should be preserved for authentic threats such as nuclear deterrence and domestic defense.
“America must not go abroad seeking monsters to destroy, as our sixth president, John Quincy Adams, stated so cogently nearly 204 years ago on Independence Day,” said Stockman.
Stockman underscores that the supposed threat posed by Iran and the Houthis requires a reevaluation. Rather than focusing on these overstated threats, he suggests redirecting military presence and expenditures towards reinforcing homeland security and averting genuine dangers such as terrorist invasions or nuclear conflicts.
A Call for Localized Conflict Resolution
Stockman advocates for local conflict resolution and criticizes the US’s self-assigned role as a global police force. He argues that regional disputes should be settled by the countries involved, maintaining that the US should not interfere unless directly threatened. This approach not only conserves American resources but also encourages responsible diplomacy and regional stability.
“…because right now, his foreign policy team is looking like John Bolton without the ridiculous Wilford Brimley mustache. Since Trump keeps hiring these people, it’s a good time to remind him that, in 2016, he won more primary votes than any Republican in U.S. history (as well as the election) by saying things like this about a war that had a million more justifications than his recent bombing of the Houthis:” – Ann Coulter
The overall message calls for a realistic assessment of international engagements and advocates for policies that reflect true American interests and security priorities. By focusing on internal stabilization and strategic defense, the US can better allocate its resources to protect its citizens from credible threats.